- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP221 vs. Hitachi CP210
Dynapac CP221 vs. Hitachi CP210
5 reasons to buy Dynapac CP221:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000 kg and 2417 kg | 19 % more or 583 kg |
| Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 1180 kg and 1846 kg | 36 % less or 666 kg |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 120 l. and 115 l. | 4 % more or 5 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 74 kW and 67.1 kW | 9 % more or 6.9 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2150 rev / min | 2 % more or 50 rev |
4 reasons to buy Hitachi CP210:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16920 kg and 21000 kg | 19 % less or 4080 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 290 mm and 230 mm | 21 % more or 60 mm |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 4000 l. and 415 l. | 90 % more or 3585 l. |
| Maximum speed | 24 km/h and 23 km/h | 4 % more or 1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 8300 kg and 12920 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 3 and 3 |
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 13/80 R20 Radial and 14/70-20-12PR (OR) |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 42 mm and 55 mm |
Sizes
| Overall width | 1820 mm and 2275 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3300 mm and 3090 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3795 mm and 3850 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4750 mm and 5010 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Isuzu |
| Model | B4.5 T and BB-4BG1T |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 230 mm | 5. Clearance | 290 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5010 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1820 mm | 2. Overall width | 2275 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3090 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3795 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3850 mm |