- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP22 vs. Caterpillar PS180
Dynapac CP22 vs. Caterpillar PS180
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CP22:
Weight
Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000 kg and 1814 kg | 40 % more or 1186 kg |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 154 l. and 128 l. | 17 % more or 26 l. |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS180:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16905 kg and 21000 kg | 19 % less or 4095 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 5 and 3 | 40 % more or 2 |
Sizes
Clearance | 276 mm and 230 mm | 17 % more or 46 mm |
Operation
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 380 l. and 370 l. | 3 % more or 10 l. |
Maximum speed | 38.6 km/h and 29 km/h | 25 % more or 9.6 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 8060 kg and 4994 kg |
Tyres
Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
Standard tyre size | 11.00X20-18 layers and 7.5x15 10 layers |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4950 mm and 4140 mm |
Overall width | 1820 mm and 1854 mm |
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2680 mm and 2641 mm |
Wheelbase | 3795 mm and 3353 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Perkins |
Model | OM-366 and 4.2 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4950 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4140 mm |
2. Overall width | 1820 mm | 2. Overall width | 1854 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2680 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2641 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3795 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3353 mm |
5. Clearance | 230 mm | 5. Clearance | 276 mm |