- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP271 vs. YTO LRS1016
Dynapac CP271 vs. YTO LRS1016
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CP271:
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 23 km/h and 14 km/h | 39 % more or 9 km/h |
5 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16000 kg and 27000 kg | 41 % less or 11000 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 240 l. and 120 l. | 50 % more or 120 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 480 l. and 415 l. | 14 % more or 65 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 75 kW and 74 kW | 1 % more or 1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 12400 kg and 9000 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 13.80 R20 Radial and 11.00-20.16 |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 42 mm and 40 mm |
Sizes
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3470 mm and 3162 mm |
| Wheelbase | 4050 mm and 3700 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5150 mm and 4770 mm |
| Overall width | 2350 mm and 2290 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | B4.5T and 4BT3.9 |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 4050 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 5150 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2350 mm | 2. Overall width | 2290 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3470 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm |