- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP271 vs. YTO YL25
Dynapac CP271 vs. YTO YL25
5 reasons to buy YTO YL25:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 25000 kg and 27000 kg | 7 % less or 2000 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 160 l. and 120 l. | 25 % more or 40 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 450 l. and 415 l. | 8 % more or 35 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 100 kW and 74 kW | 26 % more or 26 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 12400 kg and 16000 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 5 |
| Standard tyre size | 13.80 R20 Radial and 11.00-20.16 |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 42 mm and 40 mm |
Sizes
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3470 mm and 3350 mm |
| Wheelbase | 4050 mm and 3630 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5150 mm and 4730 mm |
| Overall width | 2350 mm and 2790 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 23 km/h and 23 km/h |
Motor
| Model | B4.5T and 6BT5.9 |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5150 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4730 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2350 mm | 2. Overall width | 2790 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3470 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3350 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 4050 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3630 mm |