- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Hamm HD10K vs. Dynapac CP142
Hamm HD10K vs. Dynapac CP142
3 reasons to buy Dynapac CP142:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 140 l. and 40 l. | 71 % more or 100 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 500 l. and 200 l. | 60 % more or 300 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 74 kW and 18.5 kW | 75 % more or 55.5 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 2500 kg and 6000 kg |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 2410 mm and 3580 mm |
| Overall width | 1070 mm and 1760 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 1660 mm and 2990 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | F2L1011F and B4.5 T |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 2410 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3580 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1070 mm | 2. Overall width | 1760 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 1660 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm |