- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT125R vs. Dynapac CP22
Ingersoll Rand PT125R vs. Dynapac CP22
7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT125R:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 7580 kg and 21000 kg | 64 % less or 13420 kg |
| Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 458 kg and 1151 kg | 60 % less or 693 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Sizes
| Clearance | 330 mm and 230 mm | 30 % more or 100 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 379 l. and 154 l. | 59 % more or 225 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 379 l. and 370 l. | 2 % more or 9 l. |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CP22:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000 kg and 1227 kg | 59 % more or 1773 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 4125 kg and 8060 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 7.5-15, 14 layers and 11.00X20-18 layers |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 12 mm and 42 mm |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3895 mm and 4950 mm |
| Overall width | 1980 mm and 1820 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3225 mm and 2680 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2920 mm and 3795 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Model | B 3.3T-85 and OM-366 |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3225 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2680 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2920 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3795 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 330 mm | 5. Clearance | 230 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 3895 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4950 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1980 mm | 2. Overall width | 1820 mm |