- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Caterpillar PS110
Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Caterpillar PS110
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT240R:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 2970 kg and 1134 kg | 62 % more or 1836 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 300 mm and 276 mm | 8 % more or 24 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 128 l. | 49 % more or 122 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 73.8 kW and 57.4 kW | 22 % more or 16.4 kW |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS110:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12415 kg and 24000 kg | 48 % less or 11585 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
| Rear tyres number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 38.6 km/h and 19 km/h | 51 % more or 19.6 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 16360 kg and 3827 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11X20 18 layers and 7.5x15 |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5440 mm and 4140 mm |
| Overall width | 2310 mm and 2134 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm and 2489 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3353 mm |
Motor
| Model | Cummins 4.5-C99 and 4.2 |
| Manufacturer | BT and Perkins |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2489 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3353 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 300 mm | 5. Clearance | 276 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4140 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2310 mm | 2. Overall width | 2134 mm |