- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Caterpillar PS200B
Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Caterpillar PS200B
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT240R:
Weight
Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 2970 kg and 2015.8 kg | 32 % more or 954.2 kg |
Sizes
Clearance | 300 mm and 267 mm | 11 % more or 33 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 173 l. | 31 % more or 77 l. |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS200B:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 18143.7 kg and 24000 kg | 24 % less or 5856.3 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 394 l. and 285 l. | 28 % more or 109 l. |
Maximum speed | 19.3 km/h and 19 km/h | 2 % more or 0.3 km/h |
Motor
Full power | 78.3 kW and 73.8 kW | 6 % more or 4.5 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 16360 kg and 4955.5 kg |
Tyres
Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
Standard tyre size | 11X20 18 layers and 7.5 x 15-6 layers |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 5440 mm and 4299 mm |
Overall width | 2310 mm and 1750 mm |
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm and 3000 mm |
Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3352 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | BT and Caterpillar |
Model | Cummins 4.5-C99 and 3054T |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4299 mm |
2. Overall width | 2310 mm | 2. Overall width | 1750 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3352 mm |
5. Clearance | 300 mm | 5. Clearance | 267 mm |