- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Dynapac CP142
Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Dynapac CP142
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT240R:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 2970 kg and 1560 kg | 47 % more or 1410 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 300 mm and 234 mm | 22 % more or 66 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 140 l. | 44 % more or 110 l. |
5 reasons to buy Dynapac CP142:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 14000 kg and 24000 kg | 42 % less or 10000 kg |
| Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 670 kg and 2045 kg | 67 % less or 1375 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 500 l. and 285 l. | 43 % more or 215 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 74 kW and 73.8 kW | 0 % more or 0.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 16360 kg and 6000 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 11X20 18 layers and 7.50-15 |
| Oscillating angle | 5 degrees and 3 degrees |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 50 mm and 12 mm |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5440 mm and 3580 mm |
| Overall width | 2310 mm and 1760 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm and 2990 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 2760 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 19 km/h and 19 km/h |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | BT and Cummins |
| Model | Cummins 4.5-C99 and B4.5 T |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3580 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2310 mm | 2. Overall width | 1760 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2990 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2760 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 300 mm | 5. Clearance | 234 mm |