- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Dynapac CP201
Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Dynapac CP201
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT240R:
Sizes
| Clearance | 300 mm and 260 mm | 13 % more or 40 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 100 l. | 60 % more or 150 l. |
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CP201:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 15000 kg and 24000 kg | 37 % less or 9000 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 4500 l. and 285 l. | 94 % more or 4215 l. |
| Maximum speed | 24.1 km/h and 19 km/h | 21 % more or 5.1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 16360 kg and 8350 kg |
Tyres
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 50 mm and 35 mm |
| Front tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 11X20 18 layers and 9.00-20-10 layers |
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3700 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5440 mm and 4985 mm |
| Overall width | 2310 mm and 2060 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm and 2530 mm |
Motor
| Model | Cummins 4.5-C99 and HIN0 W06D |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4985 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2310 mm | 2. Overall width | 2060 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2530 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 300 mm | 5. Clearance | 260 mm |