- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Hypac C550H
Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Hypac C550H
3 reasons to buy Hypac C550H:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000.1 kg and 2970 kg | 1 % more or 30.1 kg |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 400 l. and 285 l. | 29 % more or 115 l. |
| Maximum speed | 20 km/h and 19 km/h | 5 % more or 1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 16360 kg and 8650 kg |
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 24000 kg and 24000 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 11X20 18 layers and 11.00-20-18PR |
| Oscillating angle | 5 degrees and 4 degrees |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 50 mm and 42 mm |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5440 mm and 4985 mm |
| Overall width | 2310 mm and 2118 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm and 3090 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3700 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 250 l. |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | BT and Deutz |
| Model | Cummins 4.5-C99 and TCD 2012 L04 |
| Full power | 73.8 kW and 73.8 kW |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4985 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2310 mm | 2. Overall width | 2118 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3090 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |