- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. YTO LRS1016
Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. YTO LRS1016
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT240R:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 240 l. | 4 % more or 10 l. |
| Maximum speed | 19 km/h and 14 km/h | 26 % more or 5 km/h |
4 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16000 kg and 24000 kg | 33 % less or 8000 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 480 l. and 285 l. | 41 % more or 195 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 75 kW and 73.8 kW | 2 % more or 1.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 16360 kg and 9000 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 11X20 18 layers and 11.00-20.16 |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 50 mm and 40 mm |
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3700 mm |
| Overall width | 2310 mm and 2290 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm and 3162 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5440 mm and 4770 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | BT and Cummins |
| Model | Cummins 4.5-C99 and 4BT3.9 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2310 mm | 2. Overall width | 2290 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm |
