- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- YTO LRS1016 vs. Caterpillar PF300
YTO LRS1016 vs. Caterpillar PF300
5 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16000 kg and 21000 kg | 24 % less or 5000 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 240 l. and 160 l. | 33 % more or 80 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 480 l. and 350 l. | 27 % more or 130 l. |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar PF300:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 26.5 km/h and 14 km/h | 47 % more or 12.5 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 76.8 kW and 75 kW | 2 % more or 1.8 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 9000 kg and 9000 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11.00-20.16 and 13.80 - 20/E20 |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4770 mm and 5700 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm and 3000 mm |
| Overall width | 2290 mm and 2050 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3700 mm and 4030 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
| Model | 4BT3.9 and F6L 912 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5700 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2290 mm | 2. Overall width | 2050 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 4030 mm |