- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- YTO LRS1016 vs. Caterpillar PF300B
YTO LRS1016 vs. Caterpillar PF300B
6 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16000 kg and 23051.6 kg | 31 % less or 7051.6 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 240 l. and 189 l. | 21 % more or 51 l. |
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 480 l. and 447 l. | 7 % more or 33 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar PF300B:
Operation
Maximum speed | 20 km/h and 14 km/h | 30 % more or 6 km/h |
Motor
Full power | 78.3 kW and 75 kW | 4 % more or 3.3 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 9000 kg and 13997.9 kg |
Tyres
Standard tyre size | 11.00-20.16 and 13/80 x 20 |
Wheel track/tyre overlap | 40 mm and 48 mm |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4770 mm and 5300 mm |
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm and 3000 mm |
Overall width | 2290 mm and 2000 mm |
Wheelbase | 3700 mm and 4030 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | 4BT3.9 and 3054 DIT |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5300 mm |
2. Overall width | 2290 mm | 2. Overall width | 2000 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 4030 mm |