- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- YTO LRS1016 vs. Caterpillar PS150C
YTO LRS1016 vs. Caterpillar PS150C
4 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 240 l. and 173 l. | 28 % more or 67 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 480 l. and 394 l. | 18 % more or 86 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12940 kg and 16000 kg | 19 % less or 3060 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 14 km/h | 45 % more or 11.6 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 9000 kg and 4885 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11.00-20.16 and 8.50/90x15 6 layers |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 40 mm and 13 mm |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4770 mm and 4290 mm |
| Overall width | 2290 mm and 1740 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm and 3000 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3700 mm and 3340 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | 4BT3.9 and 3054C |
| Full power | 75 kW and 75 kW |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2290 mm | 2. Overall width | 1740 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm |