- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- YTO LRS1016 vs. YTO YL25
YTO LRS1016 vs. YTO YL25
4 reasons to buy YTO LRS1016:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 16000 kg and 25000 kg | 36 % less or 9000 kg |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 240 l. and 160 l. | 33 % more or 80 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 480 l. and 450 l. | 6 % more or 30 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 17 % more or 400 rev |
4 reasons to buy YTO YL25:
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
| Rear tyres number | 6 and 5 | 17 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 23 km/h and 14 km/h | 39 % more or 9 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 100 kW and 75 kW | 25 % more or 25 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 9000 kg and 16000 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11.00-20.16 and 11.00-20.16 |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 40 mm and 40 mm |
Sizes
| Overall width | 2290 mm and 2790 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm and 3350 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4770 mm and 4730 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3700 mm and 3630 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | 4BT3.9 and 6BT5.9 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4770 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4730 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2290 mm | 2. Overall width | 2790 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3162 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3350 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3700 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3630 mm |