- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- YTO YL25 vs. Caterpillar PF200
YTO YL25 vs. Caterpillar PF200
4 reasons to buy YTO YL25:
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 3 | 40 % more or 2 |
| Rear tyres number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 450 l. and 350 l. | 22 % more or 100 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 100 kW and 49.2 kW | 51 % more or 50.8 kW |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar PF200:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 14000 kg and 25000 kg | 44 % less or 11000 kg |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 24 km/h and 23 km/h | 4 % more or 1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 16000 kg and 7000 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11.00-20.16 and 11x80-20/C20 |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4730 mm and 4500 mm |
| Overall width | 2790 mm and 1720 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3350 mm and 2930 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3630 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 160 l. and 160 l. |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
| Model | 6BT5.9 and F4L 912 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4730 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4500 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2790 mm | 2. Overall width | 1720 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3350 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3630 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3200 mm |