- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- YTO YL25 vs. Ingersoll Rand PT125R
YTO YL25 vs. Ingersoll Rand PT125R
4 reasons to buy YTO YL25:
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
| Rear tyres number | 6 and 5 | 17 % more or 1 |
Operation
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 450 l. and 379 l. | 16 % more or 71 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 100 kW and 64.1 kW | 36 % more or 35.9 kW |
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT125R:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 7580 kg and 25000 kg | 70 % less or 17420 kg |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 379 l. and 160 l. | 58 % more or 219 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 16000 kg and 4125 kg |
Tyres
| Standard tyre size | 11.00-20.16 and 7.5-15, 14 layers |
| Wheel track/tyre overlap | 40 mm and 12 mm |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4730 mm and 3895 mm |
| Overall width | 2790 mm and 1980 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3350 mm and 3225 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3630 mm and 2920 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | 6BT5.9 and B 3.3T-85 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4730 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3895 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2790 mm | 2. Overall width | 1980 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3350 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3225 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3630 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2920 mm |