- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP433E vs. Hamm 3520P
Caterpillar CP433E vs. Hamm 3520P
4 reasons to buy Hamm 3520P:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.9 mm and 1.6 mm | 16 % more or 0.3 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 330 kN and 134 kN | 59 % more or 196 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 160 l. | 47 % more or 140 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 147 kW and 75 kW | 49 % more or 72 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 4960 mm and 6210 mm |
| Between tyres width | 1650 mm and 2390 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2970 mm and 2990 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1676 mm and 2220 mm |
| Pads number | 108 and 150 |
| Pad height | 90 mm and 100 mm |
| Pad surface area | 6380 mm2 and 15400 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 31.9 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 7390 kg and 19900 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
| Model | 3054C and BF6M2012C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 4960 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 6210 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 1650 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2390 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2970 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm |