- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP533E vs. Dynapac CA302PD
Caterpillar CP533E vs. Dynapac CA302PD
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP533E:
Sizes
| Clearance | 543 mm and 453 mm | 17 % more or 90 mm |
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.7 mm and 1.6 mm | 6 % more or 0.1 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 12 km/h and 9 km/h | 25 % more or 3 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 97 kW and 93 kW | 4 % more or 4 kW |
3 reasons to buy Dynapac CA302PD:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 300 kN and 266 kN | 11 % more or 34 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 146 kN and 133 kN | 9 % more or 13 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 200 l. | 20 % more or 50 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 2290 mm and 2130 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm and 2990 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm and 2879 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 5510 mm and 5550 mm |
Roller
| Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 2130 mm |
| Pad surface area | 8940 mm2 and 14600 mm2 |
| Roller diameter | 1295 mm and 1523 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 31.9 Hz and 33 Hz |
| Pads number | 140 and 130 |
Operation
| Tyre | 23.1x26 14 layers and 23.1x26 |
| Working weight | 11680 kg and 12600 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3054C and QSB 4.5 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5510 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5550 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2290 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2879 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 543 mm | 5. Clearance | 453 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1523 mm |