- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP563E vs. Hamm 3516P
Caterpillar CP563E vs. Hamm 3516P
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP563E:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 266 kN and 256 kN | 4 % more or 10 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 330 l. and 300 l. | 9 % more or 30 l. |
2 reasons to buy Hamm 3516P:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.9 mm and 1.7 mm | 11 % more or 0.2 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 147 kW and 112 kW | 24 % more or 35 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm and 2950 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 5760 mm and 6075 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2316.5 mm and 2270 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 2140 mm |
| Pads number | 140 and 150 |
| Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
| Pad surface area | 8940 mm2 and 15400 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 31.9 Hz and 40 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 11880 kg and 15850 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
| Model | 3056E ATAAC and BF6M2012C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5760 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 6075 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2316.5 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2270 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm |