- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP563E vs. Ingersoll Rand SD105F
Caterpillar CP563E vs. Ingersoll Rand SD105F
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP563E:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 330 l. and 257.4 l. | 22 % more or 72.6 l. |
Maximum speed | 11.6 km/h and 10.3 km/h | 11 % more or 1.3 km/h |
Motor
Effective power | 107 kW and 93.2 kW | 13 % more or 13.8 kW |
5 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2.1 mm and 1.7 mm | 19 % more or 0.4 mm |
High centrifugal force | 270 kN and 266 kN | 1 % more or 4 kN |
Low centrifugal force | 262 kN and 133 kN | 49 % more or 129 kN |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 83.3 l. and 64 l. | 23 % more or 19.3 l. |
Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 55 amperes | 42 % more or 40 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 2900 mm and 3100 mm |
Overall length without blade | 5760 mm and 5892 mm |
Between tyres width | 2316.5 mm and 2286 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm and 3146 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2134 mm and 2134 mm |
Roller diameter | 1295 mm and 1499 mm |
Pads number | 140 and 120 |
Pad height | 127 mm and 102 mm |
Pad surface area | 8940 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 31.9 Hz and 27.6 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 11880 kg and 11385.2 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x26 10 layers and 23.1x26 8PR R1 |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | 3056E ATAAC and B3.9 TAA 2 level |
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 5760 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5892 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2316.5 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm |