vs.

      Caterpillar CP663E vs. Dynapac CA362PD

      6 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:

      Sizes

      Clearance 525 mm and 453 mm 14 % more or 72 mm

      Roller

      High centrifugal force 332 kN and 300 kN 10 % more or 32 kN
      Low centrifugal force 166 kN and 146 kN 12 % more or 20 kN
      High nominal amplitude 1.8 mm and 1.6 mm 11 % more or 0.2 mm

      Operation

      Maximum speed 11.4 km/h and 9 km/h 21 % more or 2.4 km/h

      Motor

      Full power 129 kW and 112 kW 13 % more or 17 kW

      1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA362PD:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 320 l. and 300 l. 6 % more or 20 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Wheelbase 2900 mm and 2879 mm
      Overall length without blade 6000 mm and 5758 mm
      Between tyres width 2370 mm and 2130 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3100 mm and 2996 mm

      Roller

      Roller width 2134 mm and 2130 mm
      Roller diameter 1295 mm and 1523 mm
      Pads number 140 and 150
      Pad height 127 mm and 100 mm
      Pad surface area 8940 mm2 and 14600 mm2
      Vibrations frequency 1 30 Hz and 33 Hz

      Operation

      Tyre 587x660mm and 23.1x26
      Working weight 16800 kg and 13100 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Cummins
      Model 3056E and QSB 6.7 T3
      Aspiration turbocharging and water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Overall length without blade 6000 mm 1. Overall length without blade 5758 mm
      2. Between tyres width 2370 mm 2. Between tyres width 2130 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3100 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 2996 mm
      4. Wheelbase 2900 mm 4. Wheelbase 2879 mm
      5. Clearance 525 mm 5. Clearance 453 mm

      Roller

      6. Roller diameter 1295 mm 6. Roller diameter 1523 mm