- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP663E vs. Hamm 3205P
Caterpillar CP663E vs. Hamm 3205P
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 1.8 mm and 1.2 mm | 33 % more or 0.6 mm |
High centrifugal force | 332 kN and 69 kN | 79 % more or 263 kN |
Low centrifugal force | 166 kN and 69 kN | 58 % more or 97 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 175 l. | 42 % more or 125 l. |
Motor
Full power | 129 kW and 48 kW | 63 % more or 81 kW |
Displacement | 6 l. and 2.9 l. | 52 % more or 3.1 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 6000 mm and 4355 mm |
Between tyres width | 2370 mm and 1480 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm and 2775 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2134 mm and 1370 mm |
Pads number | 140 and 84 |
Pad height | 127 mm and 80 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 30 Hz and 42 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 16800 kg and 5730 kg |
Motor
Model | 3056E and TD2011 |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 6000 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 4355 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2370 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1480 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2775 mm |