- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP663E vs. Rammax RW1800SPT
Caterpillar CP663E vs. Rammax RW1800SPT
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 1.8 mm and 1.6 mm | 11 % more or 0.2 mm |
High centrifugal force | 332 kN and 64 kN | 81 % more or 268 kN |
Operation
Maximum speed | 11.4 km/h and 7 km/h | 39 % more or 4.4 km/h |
Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 35 l. | 88 % more or 265 l. |
Motor
Full power | 129 kW and 19.9 kW | 85 % more or 109.1 kW |
1 reasons to buy Rammax RW1800SPT:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 138 l. and 80 l. | 42 % more or 58 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Between tyres width | 2370 mm and 1400 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm and 2265 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2134 mm and 900 mm |
Roller diameter | 1295 mm and 790 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 30 Hz and 34 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 16800 kg and 2100 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Kubota |
Model | 3056E and D1403 |
Images
Sizes
2. Between tyres width | 2370 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1400 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2265 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 790 mm |