- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP663E vs. Vibromax VM66PD
Caterpillar CP663E vs. Vibromax VM66PD
8 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:
Sizes
| Clearance | 525 mm and 389 mm | 26 % more or 136 mm |
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 332 kN and 96 kN | 71 % more or 236 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 11.4 km/h and 11 km/h | 4 % more or 0.4 km/h |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 35 l. and 14 l. | 60 % more or 21 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 14 l. and 8 l. | 43 % more or 6 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 230 l. | 23 % more or 70 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 129 kW and 60 kW | 53 % more or 69 kW |
| Displacement | 6 l. and 3.3 l. | 45 % more or 2.7 l. |
1 reasons to buy Vibromax VM66PD:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 60 amperes and 55 amperes | 8 % more or 5 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 6000 mm and 4887 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm and 2845 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm and 2514 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 1750 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1295 mm and 1140 mm |
| Pads number | 140 and 100 |
| Pad height | 127 mm and 80 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 30 Hz and 29 Hz |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
| Tyre | 587x660mm and 14.9-24 |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 80 l. and 80 l. |
| Working weight | 16800 kg and 7600 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3056E and B 3.3 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 6000 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 4887 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2514 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 525 mm | 5. Clearance | 389 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1140 mm |