- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Dynapac CA250PD vs. Caterpillar CP563E
Dynapac CA250PD vs. Caterpillar CP563E
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CA250PD:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 300 kN and 266 kN | 11 % more or 34 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 146 kN and 133 kN | 9 % more or 13 kN |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP563E:
Sizes
| Clearance | 456 mm and 453 mm | 1 % more or 3 mm |
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.7 mm and 1.6 mm | 6 % more or 0.1 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 11.6 km/h and 5 km/h | 57 % more or 6.6 km/h |
| Fuel Capacity | 330 l. and 250 l. | 24 % more or 80 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 112 kW and 82 kW | 27 % more or 30 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 5550 mm and 5760 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2130 mm and 2316.5 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2977 mm and 3070 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2870 mm and 2900 mm |
Roller
| Pads number | 130 and 140 |
| Pad height | 100 mm and 127 mm |
| Pad surface area | 14600 mm2 and 8940 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 31.9 Hz |
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2134 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1523 mm and 1295 mm |
Operation
| Tyre | 23.1x26 and 23.1x26 10 layers |
| Working weight | 12200 kg and 11880 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB 4.5 and 3056E ATAAC |
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5550 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5760 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2316.5 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2977 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2870 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2900 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 453 mm | 5. Clearance | 456 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1523 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm |