- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Dynapac CA260PD vs. Hamm 3518P
Dynapac CA260PD vs. Hamm 3518P
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA260PD:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 300 l. | 6 % more or 20 l. |
2 reasons to buy Hamm 3518P:
Motor
| Full power | 155 kW and 112 kW | 28 % more or 43 kW |
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2977 mm and 2990 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2130 mm and 2390 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 5758 mm and 6210 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2220 mm |
| Pads number | 130 and 150 |
| Pad height | 100 mm and 100 mm |
| Pad surface area | 14600 mm2 and 15400 mm2 |
Operation
| Working weight | 12700 kg and 17920 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
| Model | QSB 6.7 and TCD2012 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5758 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 6210 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2390 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2977 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm |