- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Dynapac CA612PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD105F
Dynapac CA612PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD105F
3 reasons to buy Dynapac CA612PD:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 317 kN and 270 kN | 15 % more or 47 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 257.4 l. | 20 % more or 62.6 l. |
Maximum speed | 11 km/h and 10.3 km/h | 6 % more or 0.7 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm | 14 % more or 0.3 mm |
Low nominal amplitude | 1.4 mm and 1.2 mm | 14 % more or 0.2 mm |
Low centrifugal force | 262 kN and 231 kN | 12 % more or 31 kN |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 6180 mm and 5892 mm |
Between tyres width | 2130 mm and 2286 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3000 mm and 3146 mm |
Wheelbase | 2992 mm and 3100 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2130 mm and 2134 mm |
Roller diameter | 1543 mm and 1499 mm |
Pads number | 130 and 120 |
Pad height | 100 mm and 102 mm |
Oscillation frequency 2 | 31 Hz and 33.8 Hz |
Pad surface area | 14600 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 29 Hz and 27.6 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 20700 kg and 11385.2 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x26 and 23.1x26 8PR R1 |
Motor
Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and turbocharging |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and B3.9 TAA 2 level |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2992 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm |
1. Overall length without blade | 6180 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5892 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1543 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm |