- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3307P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD200F
Hamm 3307P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD200F
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.7 mm | 15 % more or 0.3 mm |
High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 124 kN | 65 % more or 235 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 175 l. | 32 % more or 82 l. |
Motor
Full power | 152.9 kW and 68 kW | 56 % more or 84.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Between tyres width | 1790 mm and 2486 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm and 3180 mm |
Roller
Pad height | 80 mm and 127 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 42 Hz and 20.8 Hz |
Roller width | 1680 mm and 2134 mm |
Pads number | 112 and 136 |
Operation
Working weight | 7050 kg and 20181 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
Model | TD2011 and QSB5.9-TAA |
Images
Sizes
2. Between tyres width | 1790 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm |