- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3307P vs. Vibromax 605PD
Hamm 3307P vs. Vibromax 605PD
2 reasons to buy Hamm 3307P:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 124 kN and 84 kN | 32 % more or 40 kN |
Motor
| Full power | 68 kW and 56.7 kW | 17 % more or 11.3 kW |
3 reasons to buy Vibromax 605PD:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.9 mm and 1.7 mm | 11 % more or 0.2 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 230 l. and 175 l. | 24 % more or 55 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 3.9 l. and 2.9 l. | 26 % more or 1.0 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm and 3020 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 4680 mm and 4770 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1680 mm and 1750 mm |
| Pads number | 112 and 96 |
| Pad height | 80 mm and 100 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 42 Hz and 29 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 7050 kg and 6792.5 kg |
Motor
| Model | TD2011 and 4B3.9C |
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 4680 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 4770 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm |