- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3412P vs. Dynapac CA362PD
Hamm 3412P vs. Dynapac CA362PD
1 reasons to buy Hamm 3412P:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 1.9 mm and 1.6 mm | 16 % more or 0.3 mm |
3 reasons to buy Dynapac CA362PD:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 300 kN and 256 kN | 15 % more or 44 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 300 l. | 6 % more or 20 l. |
Motor
Full power | 112 kW and 98 kW | 12 % more or 14 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm and 2996 mm |
Overall length without blade | 5705 mm and 5758 mm |
Between tyres width | 2250 mm and 2130 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2140 mm and 2130 mm |
Pads number | 140 and 150 |
Pad height | 100 mm and 100 mm |
Pad surface area | 15400 mm2 and 14600 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 40 Hz and 33 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 12290 kg and 13100 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
Model | BF4M2012C and QSB 6.7 T3 |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 5705 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5758 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2250 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2996 mm |