- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3414P vs. Dynapac CA134PD
Hamm 3414P vs. Dynapac CA134PD
4 reasons to buy Hamm 3414P:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.9 mm and 1.5 mm | 21 % more or 0.4 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 256 kN and 89 kN | 65 % more or 167 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 117 l. | 61 % more or 183 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 100 kW and 62 kW | 38 % more or 38 kW |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA134PD:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2300 rev / min | 18 % more or 500 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 2250 mm and 1390 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm and 2519 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 5705 mm and 3958 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 40 Hz and 35 Hz |
| Roller width | 2140 mm and 1370 mm |
| Pads number | 140 and 72 |
| Pad height | 100 mm and 76 mm |
| Pad surface area | 15400 mm2 and 8400 mm2 |
Operation
| Working weight | 14300 kg and 4750 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and John Deere |
| Model | TDC2012 and 5030 TF270 |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2519 mm |
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5705 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 3958 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2250 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1390 mm |