- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3414P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD105F
Hamm 3414P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD105F
1 reasons to buy Hamm 3414P:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257.4 l. | 14 % more or 42.6 l. |
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2.1 mm and 1.9 mm | 10 % more or 0.2 mm |
High centrifugal force | 270 kN and 256 kN | 5 % more or 14 kN |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Between tyres width | 2250 mm and 2286 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm and 3146 mm |
Overall length without blade | 5705 mm and 5892 mm |
Roller
Pad height | 100 mm and 102 mm |
Pad surface area | 15400 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 40 Hz and 27.6 Hz |
Roller width | 2140 mm and 2134 mm |
Pads number | 140 and 120 |
Operation
Working weight | 14300 kg and 11385.2 kg |
Motor
Model | TDC2012 and B3.9 TAA 2 level |
Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm |
1. Overall length without blade | 5705 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5892 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2250 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm |