- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3414P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD116F
Hamm 3414P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD116F
1 reasons to buy Hamm 3414P:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257.4 l. | 14 % more or 42.6 l. |
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD116F:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2.2 mm and 1.9 mm | 14 % more or 0.3 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 271 kN and 256 kN | 6 % more or 15 kN |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 2250 mm and 2286 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm and 3146 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 5705 mm and 5895 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 40 Hz and 34 Hz |
| Roller width | 2140 mm and 2134 mm |
| Pads number | 140 and 112 |
| Pad height | 100 mm and 127 mm |
| Pad surface area | 15400 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
Operation
| Working weight | 14300 kg and 11362.5 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | TDC2012 and QSB5.9-3OT |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5705 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5895 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2250 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm |