- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3414P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD200F
Hamm 3414P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD200F
1 reasons to buy Hamm 3414P:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257 l. | 14 % more or 43 l. |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.9 mm | 5 % more or 0.1 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 256 kN | 29 % more or 103 kN |
Motor
| Full power | 152.9 kW and 100 kW | 35 % more or 52.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm and 3180 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2250 mm and 2486 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2140 mm and 2134 mm |
| Pads number | 140 and 136 |
| Pad height | 100 mm and 127 mm |
| Pad surface area | 15400 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 40 Hz and 20.8 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 14300 kg and 20181 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | TDC2012 and QSB5.9-TAA |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Between tyres width | 2250 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm |