- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3516P vs. Bomag BW211PD-3
Hamm 3516P vs. Bomag BW211PD-3
3 reasons to buy Hamm 3516P:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.9 mm and 1.6 mm | 16 % more or 0.3 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 250 l. | 17 % more or 50 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 147 kW and 98 kW | 33 % more or 49 kW |
1 reasons to buy Bomag BW211PD-3:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 275 kN and 256 kN | 7 % more or 19 kN |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 6075 mm and 5610 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm and 2970 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2140 mm and 2130 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 40 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 15850 kg and 11380 kg |
Motor
| Model | BF6M2012C and BF4M2012C |
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Deutz |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 6075 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5610 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2970 mm |