- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3520P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD122F
Hamm 3520P vs. Ingersoll Rand SD122F
2 reasons to buy Hamm 3520P:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 330 kN and 293 kN | 11 % more or 37 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257.4 l. | 14 % more or 42.6 l. |
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD122F:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.9 mm | 5 % more or 0.1 mm |
| Low nominal amplitude | 1.3 mm and 1.2 mm | 8 % more or 0.1 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 2390 mm and 2286 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm and 3146 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 6210 mm and 5895 mm |
Roller
| Pad height | 100 mm and 127 mm |
| Pad surface area | 15400 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 30 Hz and 27.6 Hz |
| Roller width | 2220 mm and 2134 mm |
| Pads number | 150 and 120 |
Operation
| Working weight | 19900 kg and 12807.2 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | BF6M2012C and QSB5.9-3OT |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 6210 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5895 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2390 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm |