- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Caterpillar CP433E
Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Caterpillar CP433E
7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2.1 mm and 1.6 mm | 24 % more or 0.5 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 270 kN and 134 kN | 50 % more or 136 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 262 kN and 67 kN | 74 % more or 195 kN |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 83.3 l. and 60 l. | 28 % more or 23.3 l. |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 55 amperes | 42 % more or 40 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 257.4 l. and 160 l. | 38 % more or 97.4 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 93.2 kW and 72 kW | 23 % more or 21.2 kW |
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP433E:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 11.5 km/h and 10.3 km/h | 10 % more or 1.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 5892 mm and 4960 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2286 mm and 1650 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 2970 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 2600 mm |
Roller
| Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 6380 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 27.6 Hz and 31.9 Hz |
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 1676 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 1225 mm |
| Pads number | 120 and 108 |
| Pad height | 102 mm and 90 mm |
Operation
| Tyre | 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 14.9x24 |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 11385.2 kg and 7390 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | B3.9 TAA 2 level and 3054C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5892 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 4960 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1650 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2970 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2600 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1225 mm |