- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Caterpillar CP563C
Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Caterpillar CP563C
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 270 kN and 235.8 kN | 13 % more or 34.2 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 262 kN and 132.1 kN | 50 % more or 129.9 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257.4 l. and 220 l. | 15 % more or 37.4 l. |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP563C:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 110 l. and 83.3 l. | 24 % more or 26.7 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.8 km/h and 10.3 km/h | 20 % more or 2.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 2286 mm and 2316.5 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 3100 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 2740 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 2130 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 1549 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 27.6 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 11385.2 kg and 11670 kg |
| Tyre | 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 23.1 x 26 - 8 layers |
Motor
| Model | B3.9 TAA 2 level and 3116T |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2740 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2316.5 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1549 mm |