- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Hypac C832D
Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Hypac C832D
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 270 kN and 120 kN | 56 % more or 150 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257.4 l. and 150 l. | 42 % more or 107.4 l. |
1 reasons to buy Hypac C832D:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 13 km/h and 10.3 km/h | 21 % more or 2.7 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 5892 mm and 4913 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 2860 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 2500 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 27.6 Hz and 30 Hz |
| Oscillation frequency 2 | 33.8 Hz and 40 Hz |
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 1686 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 1208 mm |
| Pads number | 120 and 104 |
| Pad height | 102 mm and 80 mm |
| Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 9870.9 mm2 |
Operation
| Tyre | 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 14.9-24/6PR |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
| Working weight | 11385.2 kg and 7309.6 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | B3.9 TAA 2 level and QSB3.3 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5892 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 4913 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2860 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2500 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1208 mm |