- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD116F vs. Vibromax 1405PD
Ingersoll Rand SD116F vs. Vibromax 1405PD
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD116F:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 271 kN and 172 kN | 37 % more or 99 kN |
High nominal amplitude | 2.2 mm and 1.5 mm | 32 % more or 0.7 mm |
Operation
Maximum speed | 12.4 km/h and 11.4 km/h | 8 % more or 1.0 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Vibromax 1405PD:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 397 l. and 257.4 l. | 35 % more or 139.6 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 5895 mm and 5890 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 3255 mm |
Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 2965 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2134 mm and 2100 mm |
Oscillation frequency 2 | 27.5 Hz and 35 Hz |
Roller diameter | 1295 mm and 1400 mm |
Pads number | 112 and 132 |
Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 15548.4 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 34 Hz and 29 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 11362.5 kg and 14600 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 23.1x20-26 8PR |
Motor
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB5.9-3OT and 6BT5.9C |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3255 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2965 mm |
1. Overall length without blade | 5895 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5890 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1400 mm |