- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD122F vs. Bomag BW219PD-2
Ingersoll Rand SD122F vs. Bomag BW219PD-2
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD122F:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.6 mm | 20 % more or 0.4 mm |
Operation
Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 11 km/h | 13 % more or 1.7 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Bomag BW219PD-2:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 315.7 kN and 293 kN | 7 % more or 22.7 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 330 l. and 257.4 l. | 22 % more or 72.6 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 119.7 kW and 116.3 kW | 3 % more or 3.4 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 3105 mm |
Overall length without blade | 5895 mm and 6020 mm |
Between tyres width | 2286 mm and 2100 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 3170 mm |
Roller
Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 14300 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 27.6 Hz and 29 Hz |
Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 1500 mm |
Pads number | 120 and 150 |
Operation
Working weight | 12807.2 kg and 19476 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 23.1/18-26/8PR |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
Model | QSB5.9-3OT and BF6L913 |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 5895 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 6020 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2100 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3170 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3105 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1500 mm |