- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD122F vs. Vibromax 1405PD
Ingersoll Rand SD122F vs. Vibromax 1405PD
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD122F:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 293 kN and 172 kN | 41 % more or 121 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 11.4 km/h | 10 % more or 1.3 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Vibromax 1405PD:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 397 l. and 257.4 l. | 35 % more or 139.6 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 5895 mm and 5890 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 3255 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 2965 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 2100 mm |
| Oscillation frequency 2 | 33.8 Hz and 35 Hz |
| Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 1400 mm |
| Pads number | 120 and 132 |
| Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
| Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 15548.4 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 27.6 Hz and 29 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 12807.2 kg and 14600 kg |
| Tyre | 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 23.1x20-26 8PR |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB5.9-3OT and 6BT5.9C |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3255 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2965 mm |
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5895 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5890 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1400 mm |