- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD160F vs. Rammax RW1800SPT
Ingersoll Rand SD160F vs. Rammax RW1800SPT
5 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD160F:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 339 kN and 64 kN | 81 % more or 275 kN |
| High nominal amplitude | 1.7 mm and 1.6 mm | 6 % more or 0.1 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 35 l. | 86 % more or 222 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 7 km/h | 45 % more or 5.7 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 129 kW and 19.9 kW | 85 % more or 109.1 kW |
1 reasons to buy Rammax RW1800SPT:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 138 l. and 104 l. | 25 % more or 34 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 2486 mm and 1400 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 2265 mm |
Roller
| Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 790 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 34 Hz |
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 900 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 16508 kg and 2100 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Kubota |
| Model | B5.9-TAA and D1403 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1400 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2265 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 790 mm |