- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD160F vs. Rammax RW3005S
Ingersoll Rand SD160F vs. Rammax RW3005S
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD160F:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 339 kN and 85 kN | 75 % more or 254 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 64 l. | 75 % more or 193 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 7 km/h | 45 % more or 5.7 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 129 kW and 36.4 kW | 72 % more or 92.6 kW |
2 reasons to buy Rammax RW3005S:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.8 mm and 1.7 mm | 6 % more or 0.1 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 140 l. and 104 l. | 26 % more or 36 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 5994 mm and 3500 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2486 mm and 1300 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 2470 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 1200 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 890 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 34 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 16508 kg and 3400 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Kubota |
| Model | B5.9-TAA and V2203 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5994 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 3500 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1300 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2470 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 890 mm |