- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Bomag BW213PDH-40
Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Bomag BW213PDH-40
6 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Sizes
Clearance | 584 mm and 490 mm | 16 % more or 94 mm |
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.6 mm | 20 % more or 0.4 mm |
High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 275 kN | 23 % more or 84 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 250 l. | 3 % more or 7 l. |
Maximum speed | 12.6 km/h and 12 km/h | 5 % more or 0.6 km/h |
Motor
Full power | 152.9 kW and 119.3 kW | 22 % more or 33.6 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 2972 mm |
Wheelbase | 3215 mm and 2960 mm |
Roller
Oscillation frequency 2 | 28.3 Hz and 36 Hz |
Roller width | 2134 mm and 2130 mm |
Roller diameter | 1621 mm and 1480 mm |
Pads number | 136 and 150 |
Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 13677.4 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 20181 kg and 12689.2 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x26-10PR R1 and 23.1-26/12PR |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB5.9-TAA and QSB 4.5 |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3215 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2960 mm |
5. Clearance | 584 mm | 5. Clearance | 490 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1621 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1480 mm |