- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Caterpillar CP563
Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Caterpillar CP563
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 222.4 kN | 38 % more or 136.6 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 273 kN and 155.7 kN | 43 % more or 117.3 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 254 l. | 1 % more or 3 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 152.9 kW and 108.1 kW | 29 % more or 44.8 kW |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP563:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 132 l. and 104 l. | 21 % more or 28 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.8 km/h and 12.6 km/h | 2 % more or 0.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 2997 mm |
| Overall length with blade | 6280 mm and 5258 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2486 mm and 2440 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 30 Hz |
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 2130 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1621 mm and 1549 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 20181 kg and 11580 kg |
| Tyre | 23.1x26-10PR R1 and 23.1x26 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB5.9-TAA and 3116 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2440 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2997 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1621 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1549 mm |