- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Caterpillar CP563E
Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Caterpillar CP563E
8 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Sizes
Clearance | 584 mm and 456 mm | 22 % more or 128 mm |
Roller
Low centrifugal force | 273 kN and 133 kN | 51 % more or 140 kN |
High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.7 mm | 15 % more or 0.3 mm |
High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 266 kN | 26 % more or 93 kN |
Operation
Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 55 amperes | 42 % more or 40 amperes |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 104 l. and 64 l. | 38 % more or 40 l. |
Maximum speed | 12.6 km/h and 11.6 km/h | 8 % more or 1.0 km/h |
Motor
Full power | 152.9 kW and 112 kW | 27 % more or 40.9 kW |
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP563E:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 330 l. and 257 l. | 22 % more or 73 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length with blade | 6280 mm and 6300 mm |
Between tyres width | 2486 mm and 2316.5 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 3070 mm |
Wheelbase | 3215 mm and 2900 mm |
Roller
Pads number | 136 and 140 |
Pad height | 127 mm and 127 mm |
Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 8940 mm2 |
Roller width | 2134 mm and 2134 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 31.9 Hz |
Roller diameter | 1621 mm and 1295 mm |
Operation
Tyre | 23.1x26-10PR R1 and 23.1x26 10 layers |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
Working weight | 20181 kg and 11880 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSB5.9-TAA and 3056E ATAAC |
Images
Sizes
5. Clearance | 584 mm | 5. Clearance | 456 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2316.5 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3070 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3215 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2900 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1621 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm |


