- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Caterpillar CP663E
Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Caterpillar CP663E
8 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Sizes
| Clearance | 584 mm and 525 mm | 10 % more or 59 mm |
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.8 mm | 10 % more or 0.2 mm |
| Low centrifugal force | 273 kN and 166 kN | 39 % more or 107 kN |
| High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 332 kN | 8 % more or 27 kN |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 55 amperes | 42 % more or 40 amperes |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 104 l. and 80 l. | 23 % more or 24 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.6 km/h and 11.4 km/h | 10 % more or 1.2 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 152.9 kW and 129 kW | 16 % more or 23.9 kW |
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257 l. | 14 % more or 43 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 3215 mm and 2900 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2486 mm and 2370 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 3100 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 2134 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1621 mm and 1295 mm |
| Pads number | 136 and 140 |
| Pad height | 127 mm and 127 mm |
| Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 8940 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 20181 kg and 16800 kg |
| Tyre | 23.1x26-10PR R1 and 587x660mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB5.9-TAA and 3056E |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2370 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3215 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2900 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 584 mm | 5. Clearance | 525 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1621 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm |